Quote:
Originally Posted by One  I'm not sure how respectful it is of the site's moderation team to essentially reopen a thread that was closed. We'll have to see what Dan says.
Flawed or not, their advanced knowledge of math and physics makes them much more qualified than I.
you can't argue against experimental results.
Einstein had a degree from a Zürich university when he worked in the patent office, and I don't think auto manufacturing is quite equivalent to quantum physics. As Edison said: "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk."
I'm not quite willing to buy a DVD to hear Mr. Bearden's explanation. The alleged poor quality of accredited universities (which are the source of many modern innovations and technology) does not seem relevant to what is essentially a deception on Dr. Bearden's part. I could at this moment buy a degree from Mr. Bearden's Trinity College and University in any field I wished. This makes it meaningless. That Mr. Bearden feels it necessary to deceive us about his education by affixing 'Doctor' before his name is enlightening as to his character.
I apologize, I was using the primary dictionary definition. My reference must be out of date. I've updated my understanding and we can consider the matter settled.
I'm getting a 'Page Not Found' error for http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ Alpha Institute for Advanced Study is Myron Evan's personal website. Mr. Evan's theories don't seem to be in very good standing either.
Good lord man. Why do they all have to host their own material? Do you really consider these credible sources? |
This thread is on the physics the other is on "unbelivable results" where I started to discuss the physics towards the end.
If someone has a degree in physics it can almost be guaranteed that anything under non-equilibrium thermodyamics is out of their expertise to the point they will most likely fight tooth and nail even admitting the concepts are possible. There are a few I'm sure as not all are personally threatened. But, having them review anything is like having a Greek professor give an opinion on Chinese as the two systems are very, very different.
I agree with you that experimental results can't be argued with. Tom Bearden's MEG device has nothing to do with the devices I have replicated. Tom Bearden has solved for the source charge problem considered one of the most difficult of all mysteries in physics to solve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The source charge problem—“the most difficult problem in classical and quantum electrodynamics”*—solved by Tom Bearden.
*— Prof. Emeritus Dipak K. Sen,
Dept. of Mathematics,
U. of Toronto"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of the breakthrough understandings Bearden has solved for cover the devices I have replicated and the inner workings of the batteries being charged in this manner are explained in the paper you have in your possession.
The technology and innovations from these accredited universities are all 100% encompassed by closed system thermodynamics...at least as far anything relevant to energy production, etc... obviously their science is useful and has its place for a lot of practical applications like this computer I'm typing on so please don't take what I say out of context. It has its place but their accredidation is useless when it comes to science that is not practiced or admitted by them. There are at minimum about 25 fundamental flaws in all of their physics especially in electromagnetic and electrical sciences.
"“It is not possible to understand the magnetic effects of materials in any honest way from the point of view of classical physics.” —Richard Feynman
1965 Nobel Prize winning physicis"
I believe Feynman's credibility is not in question as he is a truly accepted pioneer in various areas of physics and his opinion is not only credible but highly revered especially by conventional physics schools of thought. His quote is reflecting the inability of classical physics to even encompass magnetics. The accredited schools you seem to hold in high esteem revolve around this science that it cannot explain for the fact that the books on electromagnetic and electrical science have not been updated for about a hundred years! lol
It is your opinion Bearden is trying to deceive anyone. You're not willing to hear it directly from him in the documentary so be it. You're entitled to your opinion and I don't believe it needs to be restated by you as I have read it clearly in your post what your opinion of his degree is. So we can consider this matter settled as well I suppose. I agree we disagree on his qualification possibly.
I already posted a link to the OTT site from
www.archive.org it is no longer available to the public and is for members only now. It is in this thread towards the beginning or towards the end of the closed thread.
Evans standing according to your source is nothing but an opinion. I have already posted a link to countless published papers by Evans as he probably has around 600 published papers in peer reviewed journals so we can consider this matter solved as well. Posting someone's opinion and saying it seems his science isn't in good standing isn't really a credible way in my mind to debate Evans as there will always be people for or against anything and anyone especially when it comes to anything that challenges the established way of thinking.
Host their own material? Like I said, Evans has hundreds of published papers in peer reviewed journals and pointing to something like them hosting their own information is absolutely irrelevant.
I do not believe that you are as sincere as you claim to be considering your method of analysis because it is distracting from the explanations that I felt I wanted to share and you are picking at someone hosting their own material, pointing to someone disagreeing mentioning it seems to not be in good standing, etc... maybe you are trying to prevent me from expanding the horizons as
you are for the most part only point focusing on everything but the actual content of the science at hand. So, thank you for your contribution, it has been noted that you have an issue with anything I reference so I doubt you will find anything in this thread of interest to you so have a nice day. So, I agree to disagree with you and what you believe to be worthwhile sources of information.
I'm sure you will find a thread elsewhere in this forum or in another forum more to your liking and in alignment with what you feel is a valid reference. Since these concepts violate the established paradigm's belief system as taught in your favored accredited university, I'd recommend finding another topic that refers to these sciences that pefectly fit in the box of what they find acceptable...you probably won't find much acceptable information in this thread.
You are already insulting two people I admire, trust and respect and know for a fact their integrity and honesty and passion for truly expanding these sciences so I don't think there is much more for us to discuss. You can also read rebuttals by them that seem to be missing from your analysis.
AFTER the Wright Brother's were flying their plane, mathematicians with their accredited degrees from accredited universities were busy scribbling equations on the board proving that it can't happen even though it did.
AFTER my friend who has an electromagnet that can PICK UP ANY NON-FERROUS METAL like aluminum, brass, gold, silver, etc... took it to the university he received his degree in physics with and took it to one of his physics professors to demonstrate it, the professor, AFTER seeing the demo with his own eyes began scribbling "Maxwells" equations on the board telling my friend not to waste his time because it won't work! The professor has an accredited degree in physics from an accredited university. LOL
So thank you very much my friend but I have no use for this accredited university mindset who thinks that if they don't know it, then it can't be true. This mentality is more common than you think. I respect your opinion that you give credit to established institutions of higher education as I do for what they are useful for, but when it comes to the development of new sciences outside of their box, their accredidation is useless. It is very, very, very rare to find any of them who are open minded enough to take a real scientific approach at the science. In addition to this, none are even qualified to take measurements on these systems. LOL
Take care...