Quote:
Originally Posted by ethereal  Copying and pasting links of "papers" by other supposed "authorities" does not count.
The quote by Socrates seems very relevant here:
"All I know is that I do not know anything." |
Those links were for ONE, who has questioned Tom Bearden having a doctorate by a college that is unaccredited...given for his life experience and wanted to know if anything he has done was published. That is understandable but I think is mostly relevant to how much credit or power one wants to give any accrediting body as even being qualified to say who knows what. It was innacurately pointed out that the term overunity means over 100% efficient. Even if Bearden, others, including myself in the past have said that overunity is over 100% efficient, which I have in the past not knowing the difference, we are allowed to grow our distinctions, make them more accurate and continue to expand the knowledgebase.
I have zero interest in preserving my own understandings and am not threatened by something that challenges my belief system. It is what it is in my opinion and that is it...when something different comes along I analyze it to the best of my ability and if it makes sense it makes sense and I integrate it into my understanding.
I think most people do this anyway to some degree and of course some have a difficult time accepting anything that is threatening to the belief system. To not do this is to preserve dogma and it 'may' be true that Bearden has said that overunity is over 100% efficient in the past...I don't know if he did or not but if he did and the distinction is now very clear the difference between efficiency and COP, this shows a lot of integrity on his part that regardless of his standing in this science, he allows himself to grow and learn on an ongoing basis.
Bearden and others in the field will be the first to point out that there really are no "experts" in the field because essentially, it is a new science at least with modern day understandings. The principles in pieces have been around for ages, in the literature in accepted journals, textooks, etc... but it hasn't been until the last decade or so that much of it has been holistically tied together to show an accurate picture of "free energy technologies" and so forth. There have been exponential growth in the understanding of these science of scalar electromagnetics in the last decade and especially in the last few years...mostly outside of the United States I believe but that isn't suprising considering the implications of these sciences on the established paradigm that we in a world of poverty with no abundance.
I agree, pointing to papers is not the way to go but did because of the request in the thread that was closed. I will however point to specific literature that my explanations are based on and will do my best to keep it simple so no technical background is needed. But the references will remain as documentation to the scientific validity of the concepts.
Great quote. I realize that the more I learn the more I realize I do not know. Each new thing shows me an entire new universe of learning. This is because most knowledge is in the realm of us not knowing what we don't know, or our blindspots.
Pursuing this field has its share of phonies, crackpots and cranks and I know who most of them are and I know who most of the legitimate ones are who have taken idea to the bench and achieved results. These are the ones I pay attention to and to the point of learning it to the point to replicate it myself with results.
I can understand why some people are skeptical of this field especially when claims of achieving more output than an operator inputs...sounds like perpetual motion has nothing to do with perpetual motion. Sounds like over 100% efficiency but when knowing the difference between COP and efficiency, it almost becomes common sense. I'll clearly explain the difference between open and closed systems because it is the distinction that clearly shows there are two very different system of thermodynamics that explain two totally different systems...open vs closed... and they are very different and still, neither one is over 100% efficient not even open systems.
The whole concept of the aether is an entire science on its own and is a profound one that in my opinion should be required study for most sciences since at the fundamental level, it is the source of everything.
The human mind is an open system as well as every biological component from molecules to cells to organs and so forth. The physics behind the energy technologies are just as relevant to consciousness sciences and applications such as PATHS or any other technology that stimulates increased use of potential by the mind.
For now, enjoy this eye candy of a machine that outputs 12 times what the operator inputs. I will get in to the distinction of open vs closed systems soon. So in other words this machine has a COP of 12.0, most refrigerators are probably around 4.0-5.0 and every single closed system electrical motor or anything else operating on closed system principles are ALL less than 1.0 COP.
Veljko Milković - Home Page - Zvanična prezentacija istraživača i pronalazača Veljka Milkovića
This violates Newton's 3rd law of motion. There is a reaction, however it moves to help the mechanism continue to propogate "forward" instead of entropically beating it down head first.