Personal Development for Smart People Forums - View Single Post

Aaron · 03-29-2007, 03:46 AM

One,

Despite the slight ring of sarcasm in your responses to me, I'll answer anyway.

I don't thing there is much relevance to where a paper is linked from because any paper can be posted anywhere and linked to anywhere. You can feel free to check every reference listed in that paper and other papers as virtually every reference is published in peer reviewed journals, in the textbooks, etc...

Overunity is a common term that people in the "free energy" field use and it is commonly made synonymous with over 100% efficient. The distinction is that anything overunity really means it is over 1.0 COP and NOT over 100% efficient. If you have a refrigerator, it is probably about 5.0 COP and is overunity, however it is probably 50% efficient. 5.0 COP is 5 times the work done compared to the input in electricity provided...the rest of the input comes from the environment and in the case of a refrigerator, the heat in the environment that the operator did not have to input. But compared to the electricity provided to the system compared to the output, it is 5 times the input, which is still not over 100% efficient. If total input including free input from the environment in the form of heat, etc... including the operator input of electricity is 10 parts and the output is 5 parts, that is 50% efficient. If there is 1 part input of electricity and 9 parts in heat from the environment and 5 parts of work is being done and output from the system...1 part from the operator input of 1 part electricity that is 5 times the input. Over 1.0 copi yes, over 100% efficient, NO. Total in compared to total out is what efficiency is. Operator input compared to total output is COP. Big difference. Overunity is NOT over 100% efficient.

Bearden clarifies the issue with his degree in the documentary by William Gazecki so go ahead and buy it. An unaccredited university? I personally don't give much credit to any body actings as an authority as who can say who does or doesn't have valid information especially considering the fact that most of this dispells what is taught in most "accredited" universities as being half-truths and some is outright bogus misinformation as evidenced by experimentally proven results that are published, all references exist and some up to over a hundred years old. Has nothing to do with "if that is true it would be in school" because I think we are all smart enoughto know better. Besides this, anyone having a degree doesn't give automatic credibility. Einstein worked in a patent office originally, Ford had a 4th grade education or so but would be considered an authority on auto manufacturing so the point is moot in my opinion.

An old Office of Transportation Technologies website by the Dept. of Energy is in an archive here: OTT - Advanced Electromagnetic Theory: Contact Information
Tom Bearden is listed as the project manager...they aren't going to involve peole in advanced projects unless they are qualified and qualified is exactly what Tom Bearden is in this field of scalar electromagnetics.

A little of guage theory: OTT - Advanced Electromagnetic Theory: What is a Gauge?

The goal of OTT's project:
OTT - Advanced Electromagnetic Theory: Program Goal

AIAS has their website here: Alpha Institute for Advanced Study - Home
and Myron Evans is the leading physicist in the world and is considered by many even conventional authorities as the most important physicist alive. He has the most accurate and most full comprehension of a grand unified field theory to date. Much of his work ties into Bearden's and you will find more of his work is published compared to Bearden to my knowlege.

Here are some of Myron Evan's published papers of which much encompasses "overunity" devices:
Alpha Institute for Advanced Study - Omnia opera

This is only a handful by Bearden in Textbooks, etc... and it is a matter of opinion what is a qualified journal... and DOE websites mostly closed to members only some old references to the public are only available in the archives now:
Bearden, T. E., "Energy from the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," in M. W. Evans (Ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2001, Vol. 2, p. 699-776.

14. Bearden, T. E., "EM Energy From The Vacuum: Ten Questions With Extended Answers," restricted DOE Website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ , September 2000. Also on The Tom Bearden Website website (Bearden's website).

15. Bearden, T. E., Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002) (in process).

16. Bearden, T. E. "Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum," in M. W. Evans (ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2001, Vol. 2, p. 639-698.

17. Bearden, T. E., "The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly," ADAS Position Paper, June 2000. http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ . Also on The Tom Bearden Website.

18. Bearden, T. E. "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23. On DoE website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ and The Tom Bearden Website.

19. Bearden, T. E. "Bedini's Method For Forming Negative Resistors In Batteries," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 24-38. Also carried on DoE website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ and on The Tom Bearden Website.

20. Bearden, T. E. "Dark Matter or Dark Energy?", Journal of New Energy, 4(4), Spring 2000, p. 4-11.

21. Bearden, T. E., "EM Corrections Enabling a Practical Unified Field Theory with Emphasis on Time-Charging Interactions of Longitudinal EM Waves," Journal of New Energy, 3(2/3), 1998, p. 12-28.

03-29-2007, 03:46 AM	#4 (permalink)
Aaron Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 136	Tom Bearden One, Despite the slight ring of sarcasm in your responses to me, I'll answer anyway. I don't thing there is much relevance to where a paper is linked from because any paper can be posted anywhere and linked to anywhere. You can feel free to check every reference listed in that paper and other papers as virtually every reference is published in peer reviewed journals, in the textbooks, etc... Overunity is a common term that people in the "free energy" field use and it is commonly made synonymous with over 100% efficient. The distinction is that anything overunity really means it is over 1.0 COP and NOT over 100% efficient. If you have a refrigerator, it is probably about 5.0 COP and is overunity, however it is probably 50% efficient. 5.0 COP is 5 times the work done compared to the input in electricity provided...the rest of the input comes from the environment and in the case of a refrigerator, the heat in the environment that the operator did not have to input. But compared to the electricity provided to the system compared to the output, it is 5 times the input, which is still not over 100% efficient. If total input including free input from the environment in the form of heat, etc... including the operator input of electricity is 10 parts and the output is 5 parts, that is 50% efficient. If there is 1 part input of electricity and 9 parts in heat from the environment and 5 parts of work is being done and output from the system...1 part from the operator input of 1 part electricity that is 5 times the input. Over 1.0 copi yes, over 100% efficient, NO. Total in compared to total out is what efficiency is. Operator input compared to total output is COP. Big difference. Overunity is NOT over 100% efficient. Bearden clarifies the issue with his degree in the documentary by William Gazecki so go ahead and buy it. An unaccredited university? I personally don't give much credit to any body actings as an authority as who can say who does or doesn't have valid information especially considering the fact that most of this dispells what is taught in most "accredited" universities as being half-truths and some is outright bogus misinformation as evidenced by experimentally proven results that are published, all references exist and some up to over a hundred years old. Has nothing to do with "if that is true it would be in school" because I think we are all smart enoughto know better. Besides this, anyone having a degree doesn't give automatic credibility. Einstein worked in a patent office originally, Ford had a 4th grade education or so but would be considered an authority on auto manufacturing so the point is moot in my opinion. An old Office of Transportation Technologies website by the Dept. of Energy is in an archive here: OTT - Advanced Electromagnetic Theory: Contact Information Tom Bearden is listed as the project manager...they aren't going to involve peole in advanced projects unless they are qualified and qualified is exactly what Tom Bearden is in this field of scalar electromagnetics. A little of guage theory: OTT - Advanced Electromagnetic Theory: What is a Gauge? The goal of OTT's project: OTT - Advanced Electromagnetic Theory: Program Goal AIAS has their website here: Alpha Institute for Advanced Study - Home and Myron Evans is the leading physicist in the world and is considered by many even conventional authorities as the most important physicist alive. He has the most accurate and most full comprehension of a grand unified field theory to date. Much of his work ties into Bearden's and you will find more of his work is published compared to Bearden to my knowlege. Here are some of Myron Evan's published papers of which much encompasses "overunity" devices: Alpha Institute for Advanced Study - Omnia opera This is only a handful by Bearden in Textbooks, etc... and it is a matter of opinion what is a qualified journal... and DOE websites mostly closed to members only some old references to the public are only available in the archives now: Bearden, T. E., "Energy from the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," in M. W. Evans (Ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2001, Vol. 2, p. 699-776. 14. Bearden, T. E., "EM Energy From The Vacuum: Ten Questions With Extended Answers," restricted DOE Website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ , September 2000. Also on The Tom Bearden Website website (Bearden's website). 15. Bearden, T. E., Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002) (in process). 16. Bearden, T. E. "Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum," in M. W. Evans (ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2001, Vol. 2, p. 639-698. 17. Bearden, T. E., "The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly," ADAS Position Paper, June 2000. http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ . Also on The Tom Bearden Website. 18. Bearden, T. E. "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23. On DoE website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ and The Tom Bearden Website. 19. Bearden, T. E. "Bedini's Method For Forming Negative Resistors In Batteries," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 24-38. Also carried on DoE website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/ and on The Tom Bearden Website. 20. Bearden, T. E. "Dark Matter or Dark Energy?", Journal of New Energy, 4(4), Spring 2000, p. 4-11. 21. Bearden, T. E., "EM Corrections Enabling a Practical Unified Field Theory with Emphasis on Time-Charging Interactions of Longitudinal EM Waves," Journal of New Energy, 3(2/3), 1998, p. 12-28.