I am increasingly confused about polarization. Accoring to Steve's definitions as I understand them, dictators (past and present, take your pick) can be categorized as "especially powerful Darkworkers". But clearly (to me, at least!) they are not heading toward enlightenment as their power increases, because their ultimate aim is
destruction rather than
creation (of others, and ultimately of themselves). It seems to me that LoA-related discussion in these forums concentrates on creation alone, but some simply seek to
destroy the good rather than to
create something for self-gain.
This can be resolved by suggesting that such dictators are in fact existing at a low level of consciousness. But this doesn't explain their incredible ability to influence the world, which by Steve's definitions requires a high level of consciousness.
So my question so Steve & all is: If someone is very powerfully
destructive is he at a high level of consciousness or simply stuck extremely intensely at a low level of consciounsess? Or: Aren't at least some powerful people truly destructive -- so afraid of life itself that they must deny it to others?
Here's a
recent post that shares the same concern, suggesting that it might be morally wrong to polarize as a darkworker (because of all the evil one must commit while on the way to the supposed summit where good and evil merge), and not just an equally laudable alternative.