Theo: LOC stands for Level of Consciousness, as defined here:
http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/200...consciousness/
I don't think there is such a polarity or motivational style independent of LOC. I think force vs. power describes polarity best, but that is the same as LOC -- under 200 and over 200.
I
think that most people here are around 200 to 500, which can be said to be the "unpolarized" -- somewhat equal level of force and power, though more towards power. If you polarize as lightworker you enter 500+ and you gain a new level of power. If you polarize as darkworker you drop down to 190 or lower and gain a new level of force. Both may appear to be equally successful or "powerful", but force is only a weak imitation of power and needs to continually take from others to sustain itself.
The reason why darkworkers and lightworkers can seem to be equally conscious is that all levels/abilities/functions exist within the person, but LOC depends on how "truthful" / "loving" he is, in
context. Conscious darkworkers abound, and they may have the same "content" as conscious lightworkers, but they will still calibrate below 200 because the "context" is wrong -- their intelligence is dedicated towards "false" or relative truths, their love is dedicated to the ego-self, their motivation is dedicated to personal desires, etc.
So I guess you can say polarity is actually a pointer to context -- that which is integrous and that which is non-integrous. Content can remain the same, but context is different. Likewise, following those paths can lead you to the same content (success, power, fame, intelligence, conscious free will), but the context will be completely different (fear vs. love, isolation vs. unity, etc.).
Wanting to raise (true) consciousness for yourself is actually a lightworker motivation. As Dr. Hawkins says, "raising your own consciousness level raises the sea of mankind's consciousness, and all the ships will rise with it," and so he even
suggests that you focus on your own consciousness and leave the rest to God. But consciousness must be raised in the right
context, or else it will still be "false" and actually lowering LOC as defined by Hawkins, however seemingly conscious the person may be.
I think we have to make a distinction between LOC consciousness, and "living consciously" and "raising consciousness" as Steve defines it. I think Steve's definition of consciousness is having expanded faculties of consciousness like "free will" to consciously choose how to live, or more recently LOA/IM/Subjective Reality, and LOC consciousness is following Divine Will for the highest good. For lightworkers, a person's free will will be used to follow Divine Will more and more often, but for darkworkers a person's free will will be used for his ego's own selfish ends. So indeed, both darkworking and lightworking motivations will lead you to having increased "free will" and "living consciously", but the context is completely different, and so LOC is completely different as well.
LOC and faculties of consciousness (free will, productive habits, awareness, intelligence, LOA power) ought to be separated. The context for using these faculties determine your LOC, not just the faculties themselves.
And LOC determines your subjective experience of reality -- so I'd be careful when choosing a polarity, it has consequences.
I think this whole thing is beginning to unravel
Thanks for participating in this discussion!