Even though Steve has taken the tone of the authority over the past few blog entries (nothing wrong with that, it's just a different style to how he used to write), he is still exploring and developing the ideas of polarization as he goes along. You can see this development reading from the first time he wrote on this topic.
I assume he's honed the concept as he responded to feedback from email and this forum, clarifying for his audience. But it can't be denied that some of his ideas have changed. For example, he initially gave examples that suggested that individual goals align well with a particular polarity. Now, it is only a person that is polarized, not a goal.
I think it's really cool to be witness to a personal-development-guru-in-the-making hone his ideas. But at this stage, I feel that this particular model is far from polished, and until it is out of the prototype stage I'm posting it in the interesting but irrelevant pile. Understand that I have no interest in convincing anyone else of my opinion, or discrediting Steve's concept. It's just not for me at this point.
The path I am walking makes it difficult to put into words my experience of reality, because words are mere signposts to the thing. But what I have experienced is a glimpse of transcendence of duality - away from the polarization of the world of form.
But I would like to say, that most of Steve's other stuff has been totally useful to me and I'll be watching with great interest the development of this idea.
|