View Single Post
Old 03-24-2007, 12:20 PM   #59 (permalink)
Michael Chui
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 3,977
Michael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud of
Default

I still agree that polarization may not be necessarily better than a balance, but I'm convinced that impaul99 doesn't understand polarization. You're drawing far too many connections that I don't think are correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by impaul99 View Post
Why not just become balanced like the universe? Why not embrace the duality of our light/dark side and use it to teach us to move to higher levels of consciousness instead of thinking that we have to pick one side or the other otherwise we'll be cancelling ourselves out.
Why aren't we both tall and short? Why aren't we every ethnic race? Why haven't we been brought up as a member of every culture? What's wrong with being different?

Quote:
Originally Posted by impaul99 View Post
Our light/dark side is independant of the consciousness scale in my opinion and I think it should be balanced.
The first half of that isn't disputed, neither by you or by Steve, near as I read his article.

Quote:
Originally Posted by impaul99 View Post
By balance I mean that I would strive to both read lots of interesting books, and also write a lot of interesting articles/books. I would give of myself, and also welcome receiving. I would make lots of money and also give lots of it away, etc.
You don't seem to be understanding polarization. Lightworkers would read a lot of knowledge for the purpose of giving, whereas darkworkers would write lots of interesting articles for the purpose of receiving.

Quote:
Originally Posted by impaul99 View Post
Look at Bill Gates.... Look at Google.
You're equating "intention", which is what polarization is focused on, with "action". Again. You do not know anything about Bill Gates' or Google's actual intentions. You cannot determine whether they are darkworkers, lightworkers, or somewhere in between (though they are, like everyone else, probably somewhere in between).

The reason I agree that balance may conceivably be equal to, or better than, polarization is that fear-polarization seems to be a possible counter to Lightworker Syndrome, and that love-polarization may be a possible counter to Darkworker Syndrome. Thus, by moving back and forth, you may be able to move up the levels of consciousness without being heavily afflicted by either syndrome.
Michael Chui is offline   Reply With Quote