View Single Post
Old 03-24-2007, 12:34 AM   #42 (permalink)
Dan.Linehan
Family Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 4,896
Dan.Linehan will become famous soon enoughDan.Linehan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impaul99 View Post
After reading this article I have one question Steve. What proof or evidence do you have that polarization, in either direction, actually accelarates the process of going through your levels of consciousness.

For example, lets quantify this. Lets say that I have 10 big goals I want to work on. 5 of them would be polarized "darkworker" and 5 would be polarized "lightworker". Let's say that YOU have 10 big goals as well and all of them are polarized "lightworker".

What evidence/proof/real life experience do you have that a person pursueing 10 lightworker goals would go through the levels faster than a person doing 5 and 5? I mean, I know you're saying that +5 and -5 equal zero which is less than +10, but that's just the measure of POLARITY. How does the measure of POLARITY affect the speed at which you move through the levels of consciousness.

Maybe it has nothing to do with it. Maybe it's like saying that a WHITE car will get you to your destination FAST, and a BLACK car will get you to a destination fast, but a GREY car will not. I don't see the correlation between the polarity of GIVING/GETTING and the speed at which one transcends levels of consiousness.

I mean the only reason I see polarity related to levels of consciousness is because you said so but without giving any reasons why you believe that. It's like saying that since 1+1=2, and 2+2=4 then it must mean that Waterworld was a good movie. What does one really have to do with the other?

What am I missing?

Goals themselves aren't categorized as "lightworker goals" or "darkworker goals."

The intent behind a goal is what's classified. The energy to carry out a given goal comes from a "lightworker" or "darkworker" based motivation. You are either doing something because it's:

a. Good you you.
b. For the greatest good of all.

Goals themselves are neutral.
Dan.Linehan is offline   Reply With Quote