View Single Post
Old 02-15-2010, 09:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Nameless One
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 902
Nameless One is on a distinguished road
Default

Would it be more accurate to talk in terms of monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides?

Supposedly a cooked potato has a higher glycemic index than a lot of sweet fruits. I was under the impression that a cooked potato still consisted mostly of polysaccharides, but smaller ones which would be readily broken down into usable monosaccharides. So it would seem that despite the potato having polysaccharides, according to the GI charts I see everywhere on the web, it will still put sugar through the intestinal wall into the bloodstream faster than a wide variety of sweet fruits. I wonder why this is, when the fruits carbohydrates consist of monosaccharides which don't need to be broken down.

Last edited by Nameless One; 02-15-2010 at 09:20 PM. Reason: sweet/sugary
Nameless One is offline   Reply With Quote