View Single Post
Old 02-12-2010, 09:26 PM   #12 (permalink)
rei
Family Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: earth, everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 9,713
rei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant futurerei has a brilliant future
Default

fascinating idea... not sure i fit into it though.

i haven't really polarized, but i'm definitely service-to-all.
meaning, i came here that way, without any official dedication of myself.

not really very feminine though. i do a lot of things that are more masculine, but in terms of the chakra stuff... yeah, i'm spacey (not the spaciest though, seen much spacier love-n-lighters). then again, i say i'm not feminine but i'm not entirely masculine either. i'm an androgyne. that could also be one reason i don't fit with this theory.

in terms of the chakra energy, i'm not as much about the root as the crown. in terms of assigning gender energy to lightwork and darkwork, i don't fit that theory.

so, for example...

"Light is masculine because it provides the energy of creation. Expose yourself to it and you will be shaped in its image. Lightworkers take on a feminine energy as they submit more and more to the light. They are entrusting themselves, their will, to the highest good of all, with faith that they will be cared for as they care for others. This does not mean total passivity-indeed they can keep up with their masculine counterparts when necessary-it simply determines their source of energy."

i don't mesh with this... but i have been exposed to the light of Source with increasing intensity over the years. maybe this is a theory that is limited to intentional polarization, rather than how a person is born and naturally expresses? in my own case, it is not that i submit to the light, but i don't force my will on the light either - this is why i find so much value from the notion of co-creation. the light is my partner in 'crime', neither myself nor the light is in charge of the creative process - it is both of us, working in concert to effect change or energize an outcome. or rather, i am the light, so there is no reason to submit to that which is already myself.

another reason i may not fit with this is that i don't see it as a choice between love and power, i see them as inseparable. i see it as a matter of which one you choose to focus on, but choosing love as a focus means you invite power as well, and choosing power means you invite love. i don't think they can be divided, but perhaps an individual can choose to ignore the evidence of attracting the other side of the energy.

Last edited by rei; 02-12-2010 at 09:35 PM.
rei is offline   Reply With Quote