Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariel Bravy  Earlier in the thread it's been brought up that the calibration results change. Heck, even Hawkins' own results change when calibrating his own books. I've pointed out a number of such discrepancies here. |
Yeah, that should set alarms ringing for more people IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariel Bravy The conclusion I've come to is that kinesiology is simply not a reliably valid method for determining Truth [...] |
Same here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariel Bravy So yeah, the whole muscle testing thing... not so much. A funny thing that keeps running through my mind... Hawkins calibrated that neither UFOs nor extraterrestrials are real. (Truth vs. Falsehood, p. 359) Quite honestly I believe in life on other planets from what all I've seen and discovered. Should aliens actually make themselves known sometime within the next couple years, this'll definitely throw a wrench in the whole kinesiology thing as most of the stuff like if Jesus and Mary were actually married or if such-and-such calibrates at whatever level we have to just accept since we have no real way of proving one way or another. |
Yeah, I am overwhelmingly convinced of the existence of extraterrestrial life as well. This is another factor which sets alarms ringing for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariel Bravy I really wish AK worked. It'd be awesome to have something to rely upon as a sort of Truth-o-meter, but it just really doesn't sit well with me. |
Yeah, it would be nice to have a truth-o-meter, but somehow I get the overwhelmingly strong impression that the secrets of existence require more than muscle testing to divulge.
Why bother with physical experience to learn truth when we can just bust out the ol-handy dandy muscle testing truth machine?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curtis2011 Whether you believe something or not does not determine if it is true or false. |
Neither does muscle testing...