This whole polarity issues seems to have mutated. First it was lightworker versus darkworker. Now it's seems like it is warped itself into, the love-polarized problem solving mindset versus the fear-polarized problem mindset. Nice change up.
Whatever happened to goal oriented mindsets for problem solving? How the hell is freaking love-polarization (or fear-polarization for that matter) going to help with determining whether a given problem is NP-complete or simply P?
If Steve is just trying to say that looking at two extremes can give one insight to a problem, then why in the world is he choosing love versus fear? This is psychobabble. There is nothing here other than telling people to view things from opposite sides to gain perspective while driving home the idea that some great fountain of universal moral knowledge has been discovered. Bah!
Yes, next time I have something to figure out I'm going to ask two questions of myself:
"What would Jesus do?"
"What would Hitler do?"
(*note: both died before their times if history or biblical knowledge is to be believed)
How about I ask a different set of questions?
"What would Einstein do?"
"What would Van Gogh do?"
Or maybe:
"What would a Democrat do?"
"What would a Republican do?"
The best:
"What would Santa do?"
"What would The Grinch do?"
You could extend this into something useful by defining a whole mess of perspectives like the colored thinking hats. It's possible to do a lot with such a concept, but love-polarization versus hate-polarization sounds like a canceled TBN special. Again, all this is equivalent to the left-hand versus right-hand path nonsense in the occult world. Double Bah!
As they say around these parts, GiT heR DonE!!!11
|