I'm very confused with all this (so much that I think I need a rest from this forum...).
From a phsychological approach, there are three usual attitudes: Agressive, Assertive and Passive.
Very close to Dark-Polarized, Assertive and Light-Polarized.
I've always read everywhere that the best is to be assertive. To defend yourself without attacking others. Not to hurt nor to be hurted. Live and let live, etc. But all of this got me wondering... too much!...
If right now I was dark polarized I would say something like...
"What the heck you're saying?... Steve has gone mad... so most of you" (that's fiction...lol)
If I was light polarized I would say...
"Sure you're right (or maybe nothing at all)"
But from my old assertive way I say just What I've said before. mmm... Jung's intuitives need to leave options open and Jung's sensorials need to choose one road.
I remember one post of Steve wondering about life after death. He doubted about if there is of there's not and feeling uncomfortable in the doubt. Feeling that was not empowering to leave both options open, so he choosed one. But I prefer to leave both options open. I'm so curious that I like to doubt most of the times. Maybe at first I get a bad feeling about the doubts (like in all about the polarization or not) but then I feel better thinking everything is possible or so.
Like I do now with polarization... or not!.
