Quote:
Originally Posted by danas  After I intended it the universe "forced" my car to be fixed. I do agree with J.V- if its believable it can happen.100%!!
If you dont believe that by sitting on your couch and dreaming you will make 100000 bucks, then you wont. But not because it cant happen. |
I agree. While it's obvious to everyone that we create our lives by taking action it does not mean that we can't create just by visualizing like JV says. I have also experienced many times that visualizing can make things happen without me taking any physical action and you described it very well - the universe "forces" things to happen. This is what people call synchronicities - and for me LOA is about using our minds to create synchronicities, LOA is not (technically) about taking physical action! But by taking physical action we automatically focus on our goals and our minds may attract synchronicities even if we don't visualize at all. Plus, we are all brought up believers in the power of action but not in the power of mind - hence many people will have difficulties manifesting without action. I'd say that taking the right action will always speed things up but is not always necessary and sometimes it may even be detrimental - when the ideas and visions about what we want are not yet fully mature in our minds then taking action can be like banging our head against the wall. Take some time off to internalize the vision, get to the feeling of it and then it will become clear if and what action to take - and sometimes it may turn out that the action that is required is minimal and things will start happenig like magic.
I can see it is very hard for many to accept LOA fully because it seems so different from the "common sense". I believe that Joe Vitale did very well by saying that the little girl must have also attracted this rape on her - this statement is fully congruent with LOA and with what he teaches. I appreciate him for speaking this clearly whereas some other Secret teachers like Lisa Nichols seem to be more "politically correct" and only believing LOA partially - she will be more convincing to the sceptics but to me she is accepting half of the story while rejecting the other.
It is easy to criticise those who teach LOA - everyone wants to be smart and not be labeled naive. But until you apply this stuff and have gained enough personal experience you will never know and may be self-restricted only to criticising those who make money on selling self-help stuff and proving it doesn't work.