View Single Post
Old 01-31-2010, 04:04 PM   #28 (permalink)
Michael Chui
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 3,977
Michael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OlivettiUnderwood View Post
We're not dealing with probability here, Nothing mathematical or even logical. Fifty percent of marriages fail, that, if you need a baseline for this obtuse application of probability, is a statistical fact. The rest, especially when dealing with humans, an anthropological application of data still obfuscates what's going on in this discussion - - and probably between men and women. You have embarked on a quantifiable discussion about probability and to what end? Is it not more relevant to discuss qualitative issues associated with human beings and their attraction to each other - - and why?
Yes. Why have you done so? Why are you using useless words like "more likely", "almost always", and "likelihood" when they have no meaning? Why are you submitting to the "tendency to over generalize"? I didn't bring up probability: you did. The fact that you didn't even realize it is your own problem.
Michael Chui is offline   Reply With Quote