Quote:
Originally Posted by yossarian  That's a very fair point.
A darkworker may start as an ethical person, but there will come times when he is free from even remote reprisal and he knows it. At this point, in order to maintain his polarization, he will have to gladly and gushingly brutualize others - especially if he has attained the wisdom to realize that stopping lightworkers from achieving their own personal development will increase his power by creating more denizens that he can dominate.
A darkworker must eventually come to face his role as dominator, saboteur and aggressor towards lightworkers and unpolarized people in order to take every action possible to increase his potential for power. |
If what you're saying is true, then why does Steve himself say that taking either approaches leads to the same result?
Furthermore, from what you're saying it should be obvious to see from the outside whether someone is a lightworker or a darkworker. Why is it then that Steve isn't able to tell whether Bill Gates, the richest man in the world and one of the most powerful man in the software and computing industry, a lightworker or a darkworker?