Quote:
Originally Posted by renie408  To play Devil's Advocate here, I don't think you have to BE a physicist or even have an in depth working knowledge of quantam physics or the physics behind the multiverse theory to know that they have applications beyond...What are the applications for this stuff again??? Anyway, Ray isn't a physicist and he isn't dealing with physicists. He only needs a bare bones knowledge to be able to grasp that quantam physics, as it is being promoted by many noted physicists, has implications for the LOA and the world he inhabits. And after all, it is probably pretty heady stuff for some of these guys to FINALLY have ANY kind of scientific basis for the LOA. |
Yeah, but it appears Ray hasn't even done that. Or studied mythology enough to back up "when you trace the aladdin story to its roots' (or even read a book about mythology)...or his pseudo-spirtual "Jesus the Christ". ...
In the example i gave above of the Yale study, he's just pinching little bits he heard here and there its ciicular referencing "well beckwith said quantom theory proves the LOA" then beckwith says 'Ray said so in his book"
I would take him more seriously if he stuck to what he knew or did some real research. I don't pretend to understand quantom physics beyond popular science books i have read, but if i were to write about it, or speak about it I would use real first hand research and/or say it applies here so it
could apply here. I wouldn't make it sound like quatom physicists belief in the LOA.
When I listen to these guys speak and they make references things that I know about and i Know they are off base, how can I take the rest of what they say seriously?