View Single Post
Old 12-25-2009, 12:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
royster
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,479
royster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppableroyster is absolutely unstoppable
Default

"There have been usability studies done about reading on the web, and due to the limitations of computer screens, most people prefer to use a combination of skimming/scanning on the web for information to avoid eyestrain. I have found it helpful for my eyes to print out Steve's articles when they are 20+ pages long. I get eyestrain reading for a long period of time, even when the language is relatively simple."

This is VERY valuable information I did not know, I REALLY appreciate that feed back. While I am almost twice your age, I'm about half as computer-savvy. Thank you for taking the time to point this out.

As regards God being either female or male, we can agree that a completed whole is both. I pointed out the movement factor as male due to the basis of life being defined by vibration (movement) though I see both as correct...the "stilness within" and yet the shaker-and-mover. In an earlier day, I simply rebelled against the mainstream Disneyfication of God being an old caucasion male.

Illustro, I appreciate your feedback, too. My writing is done with future sojourners in mind, as well as being as concise as possible. In some spiritual conveyances, there isn't any room for error.

I appreciate the growth potential you've all offered.
royster is offline   Reply With Quote