View Single Post
Old 11-08-2009, 10:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
Michael Chui
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 3,977
Michael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud of
Default

What people are doing is asking you to connect with them. Shared sorrow is half sorrow and all that: commiseration validates the sadness they're feeling, and it makes it more bearable. Granted, it's more bearable because of the social validation, yes, but I don't think that's a bad thing. That's what social validation, echo chambers, group polarization, groupthink... is for. That's largely the whole point.

That doesn't mean it's always a good thing, which is why all those terms have a negative connotation nowadays, but it's not a bad thing either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UHF View Post
I don't feel the need to dwell on how terrible something is and don't find it helpful. Perhaps this is disconnection, but what's the alternative?
Picking and choosing, mostly. Choose which emotions you're agreeing with, and which you aren't.

"That tragedy was really sad, wasn't it?" (Emotion is sadness.)
"Yes, it was." (That's fine.)
"It could happen to anyone." (Emotion is turning into fear.)
"Sure, perhaps." (Not much you can do with that, since it's probably true.)
"Even me." (Now it's getting specific.)
"No, probably not. You're different in these ways." (So you can get specific, in the other direction.)

It's still a connection, but it's a positive one instead. You don't want to dismiss their feelings, or make light of their disquiet, but that doesn't mean you can do nothing.

Last edited by Michael Chui; 11-08-2009 at 10:35 PM.
Michael Chui is offline   Reply With Quote