Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha  The story would be different if you would have a random person claiming to archive something with photoreading.
In that case the default should be either skeptic or open minded (meaning that you neither believe it's true or it's false) till you search for further proof.
Going around and simply believing that claims are true is a bad idea. |
Interesting point. You're right. That's why I posted the question here - I didn't believe it right away.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha The eye isn't the limiting factor but the brain. The brain is no computer. |
However, a computer cannot even recognize a cpatcha protection, while the human eye can almost read an entire sentence in a split-second. Intuitively, it doesn't seem that big of a feat to photoread 1 or 2 pages and memorize concrete facts.[/quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha How about going to your local library and getting Paul Scheeles book in which he explains Photoreading? |
I will see if I can find it, or if there is any certified trainer here in Romania who teaches it. Or maybe I'll order the book from Amazon.