[Klamachpin]

Wait, what?

So a way to define polarity is through energy (in the terms of the article) flow. Either the flow or current runs away from you or towards you, depending upon if you are primarily contributing to the universe or acquiring something from the universe.

But don't you have to receive in order to give, and give in order to recieve?

The way I imagine an energy flow working is like this:

universe ----> you ----> universe

Whereas what is seemed to be described as correct flow in terms of polarity would be either this:

universe ----> you <---- universe

or this:

universe <---- you ----> universe

Neither of the two "correct flow" examples jive with my idea of a current or flow. Either you become an energy storage unit without an outlet and eventually explode, or you give so much without replenishing your own supply that you implode.

The only way I can see it working is if what I percieve as a single intention as instead seperate but related intentions. For example, suppose I wanted to write a book. The action of writing the book requires of me to gather information (whether it be fictional or factual), organize and transform that information into the format I want, and then communicate that format to others. Wouldn't that be one intention, "write a book", or would it be three seperate intentions?


.