Quote:
Originally Posted by livinlife232  Well, then the whole philosophy about money as always commensurate to the value you give to the world is FAULTY |
It isn't faulty, if you primarily measure the value you give to the world in monetary terms.
It's faulty, if you primarily measure the value you give to the world, using non-monetary terms (and those terms could be very diverse in nature).
For example, some people might measure the value they give to the world, in terms of:
- the number of people they help;
- the number of awards they receive;
- the amount of praise or appreciation they get;
- the usefulness of the ideas that they are able to execute;
- the readership numbers of their blogs
- the growth of the organisation for which they work;
- the extent to which they change people's thinking for the better;
- the number of people they convert to Christianity
- the number of Olympic medals they win;
- the success and wellbeing of the children they raise;
- the types of scientific discoveries or scientific innocations they make;
- the artistic value of their works;
etc etc.