Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnoGuyRob  She actually believes "thoughts have frequencies"* (which is a meaningless statement, but sounds spiffy when it comes from the mouth of someone who's good at shamming), "the law of attraction is a law just like gravity"**, and I would like to say "more pseudo-scientific humbug," but the truth is it isn't even scientific in the most crude and unwelcome definition of "science". |
I think this may sound pseudo-scientific because our science has not yet delved seriously into the field of measuring thought and studying the law of attraction - it is only beginning to do it and so we are mostly left with these "pseudo-scientific" definitions not from scientists but from people who use and teach this law from the practical point of view. But remember that we cannot be sure if this pseudo-science will not become "real" science in years to come, many theories in the past were considered pure heresy and now have become legitimate science. In the 20th century a device was made to detect human aura - something that had been done for thousands of years by people who had clairvoyant capabilities but no background in science. Who knows if we will not have instruments to read thoughts in the future? And it may even be scientifically proven that thoughts have wavelengths and frequency just as radio waves do and they may be thoroughly analysed by science?