It has been mentioned previously... but I'll mention it again.
Does it matter if Esther Hicks is really channeling Abraham?
Even if she was making it all up (and she would be a genius considering how quickly she can "get" and respond to peoples questions in seminars)...
Does it matter? Who or What is providing the message doesn't negate or dilute the potency of the message itself. Perhaps one would believe it if the message came in the form of a burning bush... or a dream... or written in a book that is about things that happened two thousand years ago? Perhaps the medium (pun) doesn't matter here.
I read a similar thing in Neale Donald Walsch's book "Conversations with God". I will quote from the book:
" NW: How can I know that this communication is from God? How do I know this is not my own imagination?
GOD: What would be the difference? Do you not see that I could just as easily work through your imagination as anything else? I will bring you the exact right thoughts, words or feelings, at any given moment, suited precisely to the purpose at hand, using one device or several.
You will know these words are from Me because you, of your own accord, have never spoken so clearly. Had you already spoken so clearly on these questions, you would not be asking them."
Cheers,
Chris
|