Thread: Truth?
View Single Post
Old 02-12-2007, 06:14 AM   #66 (permalink)
Michael Chui
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 3,977
Michael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud ofMichael Chui has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uplift View Post
Yes, each rejects anything that can't be explained or rationalised by the mind.
I think you're going to have to define what you mean by "philosopher" and what you mean by "scientist".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uplift View Post
So I reject the notion that I can go and torture someone and explain it away with karma. 'I didnt rape her, she said no, but she meant yes. Anyway, she doesn't even know she wanted it, she created it... to learn from'. No thanks.
I've heard a similar argument before. It came from a Christian woman. The main difference was that she said God created it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uplift View Post
I can pour myself into either imagining bliss and non suffering, visualising it, or whatever, creating it, having faith, believing, or pour myself into rationalising, debating, doubting, creating arguments for and against.
I think you've solidified your position as "I am all-knowing." Why did you post here? Aren't you supposed to be above dualities like that?
Michael Chui is offline   Reply With Quote