I don't think one technique is better than the other. I just think they are used for different cirumstances and sometimes, at the same time.
Like, if you had cancer, and you wished to manifest a cure for yourself, you would obviously be very specific seeking a cure for adenocarcinoma of the lung, not just 'generally healthy' because your maybe felt your situation was dire. But you would also wish to allow the universe to help you manifest for the greater good since it may have been your previous agreement to die from adenocarcinoma for a higher purpose.
It's confusing. Somehow I always know what is right. I have, for example, been having trouble manifesting a specific financial goal. I was being extremely specific with this desire. It's been three years and it has not manifested yet. Close but never all the way. I have been receiving huge massive hints of successes by others using a similar way, but definitely not the path I have been working on. Recently I had one of those forehead smacking moments of Duh! Now I have modified my intention to be less specific and boom, it's fallen into place and seems like the gears of the universe that were stuck have begun to move again in the direction of my intention.
Technically, you must both visualize and allow. The argument comes from gurus who find one way works miraculously for them so they tell everyone to visualize every chance they get. While another guru finds that creates a "need" factor that blocks his own and his client's manifestations. They only visualize about 5 minutes a day.
What works is what works for YOU. But only you can figure that out. Just be patient. Very very patient.
Jennifer
|