Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabo  I think the proper way to conduct a scientific investigation is to report the facts as observed through conducting studies, rather than rewording truth to serve a political agenda. Having your arguments ignored and getting ridiculed is more often a sign that you are right than that you are wrong. If an argument is truly wrong, it can be refuted with reasoned arguments contradicting its assertions. However, if you can't find anything wrong with an argument, then you must resort to ignoring it or attacking it. |
There are plenty of scientific investigations to show that man made global warming is false. The idea of global warming is the only thing that's man made about it. Plenty of studies with no political or monetary agendas. You know, like the fact that a large amount of money being spent these days is in some way or another caused by the global warming scare. Car manufactures getting pushed by the government because of it and causing millions of people to starve because of plants closing down. More people are suffering today because of the HYPE over global warming, then what they claim global warming is actually doing to us. All these stupid stupid commercials, with little kids crying, trying to make everyone guilty. That commercial that has a tree hugging an efficient house and them calling it a "house hugger" as if they are forgetting that trees actually like green house gases. There is WAY to much money being made because of global warming to just turn a blind eye to the rest of the evidence clearly pointing against it.
Nothing we do to the planet will destroy it. The planet isn't hurting. It's gone through so much worse then anything we can possibly every do to it. We are just destroying what WE like about the planet. If the planet was alive, it wouldn't care. It will shake us off one day like peeling after a bad sunburn, and start nice and fresh like we never existed.