Quote:
|
And, honestly, if two studies come out, one that says that Thing A is good for you and one that says that Thing A is bad for you, they're clearly not doing the same thing. In fact, the only similarities that can be assumed from that information are that a) they're both studies, and b) they're both looking at Thing A. Since they're drawing such wildly different conclusions, the reader has to assume that they're approaching the problem from different directions.
|
In addition most of the time you, as a customer approach the subject from a third perspective, "is this healthy for me"?
Even when the studies are made with the best intention they don't answer the question of the customer.
So why should you transfer the data of the study to make a conclusion about your problem?
On the other hand your body is built in a way that it can check whether something is healty for you and give you feedback through your intution.
Sure you should feed your brain with as many information as possible, but the information that you gain from you own body has much better quality then the information you get from studies over very small problem (every study needs to ignore a lot of factors that have an effect on your health, you don't know if you may get health benifit A but lose benifit B when the study is only about A).
So test different health factors and use your intution to judge them.