Quote:
Originally Posted by themaster 
seeds you failed.. to answer my question.. see the re-phrased version of it below.. it is the same question this time without subject matter.. I have interpreted your answers from your "droll" posts.. you may feel free to change it however if this is not how you would respond..
So in summation.. I recap.. the idea and the question I asked..
Seeds how do you not invalidate all human experiences and truths????
Seeds Answer: I do invalidate all experience and people's truths and choose some to be valid it is "this or that"
themaster Answer: I do not invalidate any experience or people's truths.. it is "this and that"
Now here's a follow up question which of these answers is more inclusive/forward thinking and which of these is more limiting?
|
themaster,
In your philosophy of
total "inclusiveness" it is implied that
everyone's truth is valid, right? There is no "this
or that," there is only "this
and that" (your words).
If that is true, how then do you reconcile the fact that my truth suggests that your truth may be false?
Is my truth
valid or not?
On the other hand, if
your truth is valid, then mine must be false, disqualifying me from your "all-inclusive/all is valid" club.
How do you explain this enigma?
See if you can truly practice what you preach by not invalidating my truth which claims that your truth is false!
Your sibling,
seeds