Quote:
Originally Posted by aggie  some age related laws are made to protect the possible law breakers as well as those that might be affected as well. i personally think that men and women who have sex with children (regardless of puberty or what they may look like or portray...are probably dysfunctional or at least have ego issues and don't have the maturity to have a relationship with someone more age appropriate. i don't think you can put a disinct, exclusive age when children know right from wrong in this situation...they are pretty savvy. and let's face it girls (and guys) can lie about their age or may intentionally seduce or allow themselves to be seduced by someone much older...today, girls especially have learned the power they wield with their sexuality. someone and i would like to think it is the adults need to be responsible.....would a 30 something or 40 or even 50 something man or woman has sex with a 13 or 14 year old....like their son or daughter doing it? i am tired of the biological excuse also...we are living in a supposedly advanced, progressive, civilized society...we no longer are dealing with a tribal mentality.... |
When we mention laws as a means of protection it is kind of admitting that we determine what a specific age group should be doing with disregard with the supposedly free societies we readily propagate. My question then is, why do the adults choose to use fear instead of relevant information about these supposed dangers mostly imagined? A 40 or 50 years old with a feeble penis is better than an active 16 years old when it comes to damages done to a vagina of 13 or 15 years old girl. Most of the things we say are wrong are not, it is only that we are small gods that make the rules as we determine what is to be or not to be done, even God is more liberal if compared to us.
An advanced, progressive, civilized society should always use freedom of choice as its backbone and not rules that do not have any biological evidence. The only evidence being repeated here is the brain as having not developed well, which I think with good information provided early enough this arroyo can crossed, but do we want that? NO.