[shanlstrick]

Hi again Hilary, okay, I neglected the many worlds interpretation where wavefunction collapse is not a requirement. I see where that interpretation is gaining ground - as in quantum computing. I do tend to like that one a great deal, but it's just as strange as the other - a different universe for every possible outcome of an event. At anyrate, I accept there are still arguments in the science community - so my bad. I'll take observer created reality, because from my own experience it seems most plausable. I know I can influence events, my life is evidence.

Okay, I posted all of this as support for I M and I still hold it's true, but conceed that the physics community still argues about what it all means, still look at the outcome of these test events and make your own judgement. Observer influenced reality is well accepted. Anyway I don't want to hijack this thread into a quantum argument, we can agree to disagree and let this thread continue as it was intended. Thanks Hilary, I like it when people make me think - how else can we learn.