Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanafax  You see newsbone your assuming that the only goal of human life is the continuation of human life.
Your saying it doesn't matter if individuals are unhappy or forefully made to act aslong as the entity that is the community is being done right by.
It's ridiculous. |
Am not assuming anything but that is realism; as a matter of fact this is where most folks actually agree. Why then should the government determine the cars that people should drive in the name of reducing carbon emissions, why are you not rioting about that? Deep inside you just like every other human being, the need for continuation of species is paramount in as much we might pretend.
Governments are there to make decisions on behalf of the individual therefore I see no reason not to participate in determining its composition. Why give someone the authority to determine your destiny when you can not decide on who it should be? Why let someone decide what is right or wrong when you could make sure through the voting process that you have a credible person who can defend what right and not righting what should be wrong.
Freedom without boundaries results to anarchy which does not come as an event but is a result of a process time, am sorry to say that is where the world is heading. Thus the need for the people in the governments stop shouldering all the blame and force the community to participate in making choices of the leaders they want to have.