| | Is a voice like Dawkins' needed to counter extreme religious positions?
Or, has Dawkins simply gone over the top in reacting to what he perceives to be valueless superstitious religion?
Are his positions measured, or are they calculated to bait religious people and gain notoriety, or...?
Is there a need for religion, or is Dawkins right that a world without religion would be a better world?
Can the world get along without religion? Should it? Who decides?
Has science "unwoven the rainbow," or can science be a door to spirituality, wonder and awe?
Last edited by Megan; 01-24-2007 at 09:40 PM.