It seems to me that your argument goes something like this: Steve doesn't know everything, therefore his opinions can't be valid; in particular, since Steve hasn't experienced certain items of culture, such as Faulker, van Gogh, and Nietzsche, that either enhance or contradict his ideas, his opinions can't be valid. Yes?
Yes? Are you kidding? No!!!
I wanted to point out a place to continue with personal development.
Because I think his articles will get better from it.
I'm so sorry I offended your God...