View Single Post
Old 05-18-2009, 05:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Brutha
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 4,991
Brutha is on a distinguished road
Default

Even if you think that people should be forced to vote a small fine is probably a lot more reasonable than prison.
Quote:
It should also be law that if no confidence beats the candidates, the candidates are dismissed and new ones are picked and the system will get evaluated.
And who should do the evaluating?
Should the CIA just continue working without someone democratically elected overseeing them?
If you would just shut down everything that government does overnight, release all people from prison and stop law enforcement you will get problem that people who 'vote' no confidence probably don't want to see.

Of course you could declare that the past president continues to rule instead of a new president but I don't think that's either what people who vote no confidence would want.
__________________
I am always open for feedback on my posts. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message.

My posts generally don't contain medical or legal advice, if you have a problem seek the opinion of an expert


Talking about this in terms of “bad news” or “bad judgment by business leaders” seems archaic. It’s like describing World War One as “a serious diplomatic concern.”
Bruce Sterling about the financial crisis.
Brutha is online now   Reply With Quote