Quote:
Originally Posted by Angela  So, you think someone can be argued out of being homosexual? There are moral, religious, and philosophical arguments against females, too; the people who make them are generally considered to be misogynists (operating out of hatred or prejudice). If a person tries to make an argument against homosexuality, which a person is born with (like being female), I would believe that person is likewise operating out of hatred or prejudice. |
No I didn't say they could be argued out of it.... however I did say if they wanted to change they could be treated out of it in some cases. So does Dr. Spitzer who originally got it declassified as an abnormality.
Whether people, especially women, are 'born' homosexual is still debated ,and probably too politicized to be discussed openly. -certainly there are women who have changed their orientation over time. I don't know what you mean (nor do i care what you mean ) by 'against females'.
You can believe that person is operating out of hatred all you want. But making these arguments you're only making my point:
"the people who make them are generally considered to be misogynists (operating out of hatred or prejudice)"
labeling, name calling and not discussing.
it translates to 'since the people who making them are haters their argument is hateful. That's a tight little circular argument. ....as you have made clear, there is no point in even discussing this with you.