Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Chui  Why was he wrong about one, but no one can be wrong about the other? |
Who said he was wrong? Not me. I specifically said quite the opposite.
Quote:
|
According to the statement you made, there is no such thing as polarity.
|
I wouldn't put it that way. I would say that polarity is like feminism, though. There's no real, objective substance to either one, but there is a gestalt of concept as a result of people contributing to the gestalt by viewing it through their lens. As each person contributes by viewing it as they do, and perhaps expressing how it looks, the apparent shape shifts for others, too.
Like the Internet! There is certainly such a thing, I reckon, but all it is is the construction of people's perspective and contribution. From time to time, people try to establish rules about what the Internet *should* be, and the shape of the concept shifts and changes as people make their own rules.
But I get that the OP disagrees -- it seems that he believes that polarity exists as a real, objective "thing" in the world, a physical phenomenon, the way many people see gravity. It makes sense to write a manual, or have a definitive point of reference, like a guru, if you're looking at it from that perspective.