View Single Post
Old 01-19-2007, 08:35 PM   #115 (permalink)
Angela
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 22,520
Angela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond reputeAngela has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dor View Post
yes or no to both please
Yes to both. Again advancing your agenda, neither of your questions supports your attack on Dawkins.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dor View Post
No I specifically was trying to illustrate that science and religion and art and science were not always in conflict and i brought up a specific example of a deliberate attempt to polarize...by ignoring other things and outright lying about others.
'science' is filled with such people - stephen jay gould and franz boas,
- both of whom had marxists beliefs, and dilberately lied or distorted data.
None of which supports your attack on Dawkins.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dor View Post
It was smug? That's not what i felt when i wrote it...but i guess it says more about you than me, doesn't it?
It sounded smug to me. I apologize if you were not being smug, or were unaware that you were.
Angela is offline   Reply With Quote