...hmmm....but you're
still more worried about other people censoring Dawkins and Harris for their political incorrectness than you are where their ideas might lead...even with millions of people being burned at the stake, squashed, eviscerated, gassed and shot
for their beliefs as catalogued in hundreds of pounds of history books at your local library?
People might be "censoring" Dawkins & Harris, as in "taking them to task/finding fault," but is anyone,
anyone at all, saying we should be banning-books-censoring them? Yes? No? Maybe? If not, do you think people merely shouldn't disagree with them? Naw, I know you don't think that...
I wasn't personally offended (have no worries--I have the hide of an elephant) just astonished...and I still kinda am, actually.
Probably I'm misunderstanding you?
Edit: But still not feeling the teeniest bit unfriendly towards you, please understand!
