Tony, what I think about the article and your support of it is really a kind of "so what" value but I posted it anyway because I was startled by the unabashed self-centeredness of it and of many of the reactions posted on this thread.
I was deeply moved by RTWolf's posts and his(?) clear but unemotional responses but as a person for whom the value of true community, caring about human connection and support, I felt the need to express my concern.
The unbridled individualism is disastrous for any society. As in most aspects of human life there is a need for balance.
As I wrote what struck me most was the phrase "doing better with women" which I initially expect to mean "doing better in building relationship with women." So I was, quite frankly, appalled to realize that what you meant by that was merely getting permission to perform a bodily function with some/any/many/as many as possible females (and the assumption would be without having to pay for it - at least not more than the price of a drink.)
I'm wondering why you would use a phrase as vague as "doing better with women." It could mean many things. Why not be clear and specific? Why not say, "It is a must for men who want to **** as many women as possible"?
|