Maybe everything
this guy was taught about relationships was a lie, but I knew all this advice before I ever even had a boyfriend. I wonder where people pick this stuff up.
With the exception of #10 and parts of the intro, I'm not seeing how that stuff was politically incorrect. I think he just called it that for the attention it would bring (people thinking, "Oh! This guy is a rebel! He's so cool!").
Quote:
|
10. Being possessive is natural. A man wants to possess a woman. Women want to be possessed. In the act of love, we say a man "possesses" a woman. Total love equals total possession. This is not the same as domination. It is a partnership based on mutual trust and respect. My wife does not share my political views on many subjects.
|
Here he's advocating "a partnership based on mutual trust and respect," which is all good, but how is that possession? How is possession a partnership based on mutual trust and respect, especially since he says men possess women only rather than possessing each other? I think he noticed how all the other dating advice out there has turned the men who peruse it into misogynists and threw the thing about possession in there to appeal to those men.
Likewise with his stab at feminism, the part about evil rich people "trashing heterosexual roles," New World Order, blah blah blah, have nothing to do with his advice. He just put them in for the attention-whoring they'd do.