[Aleksander Krstic]

Originally Posted by bluedragon

If, and i repeat, if reality is the way Steve described it, then it is absurd to ask "Why are Steve and Erin changing their diets?" because the moment you ask this question, you create them and you create the truth that "they are changing their diets.". They are not doing so. You perceive them as doing so. But "you" does not mean your physical body and mind. When I say "you", I mean Consciousness, and there is only ONE consciousness. Your body, the bodies of everybody else on this forum, as well as this forum, all the computers in the world, and the whole world, are only a projection of Consciousness. Again, IF reality is subjective. But you can't prove it isn't, because "if it is", than you wanting to prove that it isn't would ALWAYS result in you succeeding in proving it. Because the moment you would believe it is subjective, it would become subjective. Does that make sense? How would you like this explained so that you would accept it, as a possibility, as a plausible model of reality, not as truth?

What I don't agree with is the way everyone says that even Steve and Erin or them changing diet doesn't exist. It's like saying that changing the belief that gravity works would somehow turn it off. I believe it's essential to keep subjective and objective perspectives parallel.