I'll just add that I dislike the term "loser". I think that "energy vampire" would be more appropriate. The problem with using the term loser is that implies that somebody must "lose", and somebody must "win". It denies the possibility that all of us can somehow "win". In short, thinking in terms of winning and losing is thinking in terms of SCARCITY rather than ABUNDANCE. I do understand the main point ajkumar is making, I just disagree with his terminology, which I think is damaging. We need to think in terms that implies we can all be winners. While it's unlikely to manifest in reality (there has always been losers, and probably always will be) that doesn't mean it HAS to be that way.
also, I think it's unfair to chastise men ages 18-25 for caring too much about girls. I mean, you are asking them to go against what every single cell in their body is telling them. I get the main point but let's be realistic. There is nothing wrong with caring about girls if you are that age. ;p
|