Quote:
Originally Posted by RT Wolf  That sounds like its based on the assumption that all forms of affecting others are ethically the same. Is that correct? |
Yes, and no. Here's what is correct:
Premise1) moral premises are incommensurable (also see Hume's "Ought from Is" fallacy)
P2) reason is redundant in resolving ethical debate, or any decision making.
P3) all decisions are based on non-rational factors.