View Single Post
Old 01-02-2007, 09:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
Adam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 357
Adam is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown View Post
You didn't tell about science witch prove there is no I-M. Would you like to tell me?
Science can neither prove nor disprove the subjective, because science relies on experiments being isolated and repeatable. I can not put my consciousness into a jar and watch the results... Even if I had already done so (one hypothesis which explains the nature of reality), I wouldn't be able to objectively observe the experiment because I would be within the experiment. Also, nobody is able to exactly reproduce someone else's thoughts within their own mind, so it is impossible to repeat any experiments which rely on the thoughts of the subject.

I-M is non-scientific, not anti-scientific, so the original poster in this thread is right in saying that "there is no science behind intention-manifestation."

With that being said, however, I have seen many examples of I-M working in my own life, and as expected, when I believe that I-M can not work, it does not work, and when I believe that I-M does work, well, it works. Despite I-M being non-scientific, I am working on an experiment for myself, to see what the effects of physical symbolism may have on I-M. I'm trying to be as neutral about the results as possible, but again, I can't put my consciousness in a jar.

Last edited by Adam; 01-02-2007 at 09:18 PM. Reason: I should check before assuming... assumption deleted. ;)
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote