Thread: The myth of I-M
View Single Post
Old 12-29-2006, 03:36 PM   #73 (permalink)
Brutha
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 8,749
Brutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud of
Default

Lets take a basketball player who believes in the Newtonian laws.
After the Newtonian laws he should be able to throw each free throw succesfully.
He is strong enough to throw the ball, therefore he is capable to throw a free throw. But in reality the Newtonian laws fail sometimes and the free through isn't succesful.

Now you can either blame the basketball player for throwing wrong or blame the Newtonian laws.

It is the same with the LoA, because people don't get the results they want you can blame the law or the person.

Nobody who believe in Newtonian laws belief that it is easy to throw the ball with exactly the right impulse that is required for a succesful free throw.
Nobody of the people who promote the LoA say that it is easy to control your own mind.

Probably nobody of the people who critisise the LoA here are able control their mind in a way that they have 5 minutes no conscious thought.
If some of you are able to do this, try to hallucinate a dog that stands beneath you and look just as real as a real dog would look like. (I bet you belief that people are able to hallucinate things, don't you?)

That is something with is extremly difficult to do. And thats only two excercise that deal with conscious thoughts.
To control unconscious thoughts on the other hand is a magnitute more difficult.

I also think that Steve wrote nowhere that Intention Manifestion is an easy way to become a millionaire.
Brutha is offline   Reply With Quote