View Single Post
Old 10-02-2008, 05:05 PM   #29 (permalink)
Barcs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Byram, NJ
Posts: 754
Barcs is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff3 View Post
I understand that but demolition of buildings this big requires lots of charges,det cord or E-caps, and many man hours of carrying, placing and wiring this all up, not something that would not be noticed....or charges big enough to leave no doubt as to what they were.
One thing that makes me suspicious about this, is that if it is as easy as a plane crash and a hot fire to bring both buildings down in the same manner, then why would the explosives need to be planted all over the building? If somebody actually rigged that building to blow and didn't want it to appear as a controlled demolition, all they would really need to do is plant a few explosives in key places (ie the core support beams in the elevator shaft). Take a few of them out and you should get the subsequent pancake collapse.

The sub basement explosions are pretty strong evidence of this as well. There was a hero janitor (William Rodriguez I think) who testified to the 9/11 commission about his coworkers who were burned badly by these explosions and how he saved their lives. Of course this testimony was omitted from the report. I do believe it's possible the building COULD HAVE fallen from the plane taking out core columns plus the fire, however I find it more likely that the process was aided by a few key explosive charges, or even possibly thermate. There's lots of evidence of explosions before the building collapsed, so really it's hard to say what exactly happened.

Then of course there's good ol' building 7. Allegedly hit by debris from the towers and then caught fire and collapsed almost symmetrically. Comparing building 7 and other controlled demolitions, they look almost the same, minus the obvious flashes and charges in the hollowed out building, however I believe if they didn't want to make it obvious, they could have done it differently.

Personally, I don't think 9/11 was soley an inside job though. I believe it was a collaborative effort of several nations (including Israel and Saudi Arabia) combined with other key elements within our government. I don't think it's as simple as "the government did it", because that would be very hard to cover up. I'd say it was more like a plan of the global elitists. But to think our government had nothing at all to do with it, even with fore warnings, doesn't add up.

Last edited by Barcs; 10-02-2008 at 05:14 PM.
Barcs is offline   Reply With Quote