People need to be careful not to begin using meaningless disparaging and possibly condescending phrases - such as "vibrational match" - to discredit someone when they happen to assess their favourite guru/blogger/hero differently. Mind you that's an opinion, just another grasp at truth.
I would offer the readers of this thread to try the following experiment:
1. Assume Steve Pavlina is doing this all for the money, and subsequently read the blog and see how you view it.
2. Assume Steve Pavlina is doing this all for the light, and subsequently read the blog and see how you view it.
3. Assume you are able to tell the difference between 1 and 2, and then read the blog.
What this brain is capable of is nothing short of amazing. The idea here could be borrowed from an author that Mr. Pavlina suggests in his books to read, one Robert Anton Wilson. That idea is: What the Thinker Thinks, the Prover Proves.
|