According to your own link the current state of affairs is: "The current scientific consensus on climate change is that recent warming indicates a fairly stable long-term trend, that the trend is largely human-caused, and that serious damage may result at some future date if steps are not taken to halt the trend."
If we don't have any political biases guiding us, why shouldn't we go with that scientific consensus?
The debate is about which solutions are the best one, but the debate isn't about those highlited words.
|