According to your own link the current state of affairs is: "The current scientific consensus on climate change is that recent warming indicates a fairly stable long-term trend, that the trend is largely human-caused, and that serious damage may result at some future date if steps are not taken to halt the trend."
If we don't have any political biases guiding us, why shouldn't we go with that scientific consensus?
The debate is about which solutions are the best one, but the debate isn't about those highlited words.
__________________ I am always open for feedback on my posts. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message.
My posts generally don't contain medical or legal advice, if you have a problem seek the opinion of an expert Talking about this in terms of “bad news” or “bad judgment by business leaders” seems archaic. It’s like describing World War One as “a serious diplomatic concern.”
Bruce Sterling about the financial crisis.
|