Quote:
Originally Posted by Trustme  I have just a general idea how photoreading is supposed to work but is 900 wpm not a little slow for photoreading? It sounds more like speedreading to me. Or did you mix up the two terms on purpose? No offense - I am just curious because I am looking at a way to improve my reading speed as well and speedreading seems the way to go for me (not photoreading). |
Well I don't think so.. It's like baby steps before I can read at the speed of 25000 WPM.. I am still learning...
Photo reading and speed reading.. names are different but have same objective ...
I got to go for final outcome... no matter what ways are .. whether it's photoreading or speed reading.. it's just small difference in techniques and use of subconscious mind involvement.. nothing much radically different..